Is a good holy bishop that keeps inciting people to disobey the man he claims to be pope. That is schismatic behavior.

If Bergolio is pope, then Bergolio > Schneider.

@porta folio manager --I'm not, Buddy Man!! I NEVER said I either obeyed them or was with them. You got me wrong! I would never bow to and obey Bergoglio and his associates. I just wish these good guys who speak alot, like Schneider...Muller, etc. would actually start doing something to overturn Bergoglio. The brave people of China have risen up in large parts of their country against the Communists thugs. The least good Catholics can do, is rise up against Bergoglio en masse....maybe at a General Audience, start chanting/shouting something against him and his "Synodal Church" and associates. And not just 3-4 people.....several hundred would get the world's attention. Thirty or forty Cardinals against Francis would get the world's attention.....not 3-4 that was tried afew years ago and failed.

it is not a particular Pope who confirms our faith but rather the papacy. And that includes Pius V, Pius IX, Pius X, JPII, BXVi . . .

The pope cannot legitimately do whatever he wants. The foundation for the office is Truth not unchecked power.

Pius IX: La Tradition. c'est moi

i don't know where you disenchanted that fake proposition, but its every single Pope who confirms our faith.

Stop with the pseudo-galicanism.

The fact that proves you wrong is that the teaching of post-VII popes is different then all the previous until S.Peter.

You can't have both. No one can judge the Pope. Not even all the cardinals of the world.

Except when a Pope teaches heresy, and departs from the constant teachings of the Church and upholding the Mass (Roman Rite). Such a break must be judged, and repudiated. Yes, certainly the Cardinals can judge the Pope if he persecutes the Roman Rite Mass, goes against constant Church teaching on marriage, divorce, and human sexuality. Any Pope who tries to destroy the Mass(Roman Rite), gives allowance for divorce, blessings for homosexuals and stating that they are good living people, giving Holy Communion to the divorced and re-married or those who promote abortion, welcoming a progession of a pagan idol into St.Peters, etc. can indeed be held accountable and judged. A Pope who deliberatly tries to break with the Faith and lead into error with something like a new "Synodal Church". can be judged by Cardinals and Bishops as a true HERETIC who is owen no obedience and should be deposed.

Spot on Kenjiro. Get the book, Benedict XVI: Pope "Emeritus" - "The 'always' is also 'forever'" By Estefania Acosta. This book examines all of the potential canonical breaches in the process of Jorge Bergoglio taking the Chair of Peter (these potential breaches are many and every single one of them look to be real breaches of canon laws and Apostolic Constitutions, and each one of which would be enough to, stand alone, invalidate the supposed election of Jorge Bergoglio)......... About the author: Estefania Acosta Ochoa (1989-) is a native of Medellin, Colombia. Master in Law of the University of Medellin (with an honorable mention in her master's thesis in the area of constitutional law), she was for years an official of the State Judicial Power and a university professor, working in the areas of civil and commercial law.
A cradle Catholic, her education took place in an also Catholic environment, making it possible that, years later, the rising professional and material successes, when challenged by a decisive and definitive conversion process, not dissuaded her from using the many talents received, in the first place, for the "Kingdom of God and His Justice", which is, in Ignation terms, to do everything A.M.D.G. This is what we see in her work in defense of the rights of God, the Church and the Papacy.

@Salvatore Bastatti Maybe you should study church teaching and stop watching those conservatives who only fool people. I never tought i would be called modernist for upholding church teaching. We really are in confusing times.

@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori You say that a pope should be obeyed unless he teaches heresy. The problem with that is that no Pope ever taught heresy. That is what is dogmatically defined in Vatican I pastore eaternus. That affirmation is just stupid and ilogical, because if a Pope can teach heresy, then the protestants are right, that you can't follow Peter everytime and we are just pope worshippers.

@Tony M You point out a blasfemous book from a women as your defense? St Paul teaches that women should be quiet about church teaching unless asked. That's your first mistake. The second is that you fallback on the idea that somehow BXVI was better than bergoglio. You fail to see that Ratzinger was one of the "masterminds" behing the modern VatII church. But i guess you are ok with a little modernism, just not as much as Bergolio's modernism.

Pls read the teachings of the Popes before VatII and stop with de false doctrine of resistance to the Pope. The Pope has to be obeyed no matter what, not questioned and not analyzed. That just makes you pseudo-protestant.

As the great St. Pius X taught: "there can be no holiness where there is disagreement with the pope"-

St. Pius X, ora pro nobis.

No, the papacy is an office, the Petrine Office, which historically is occupied by a man. St Augustine says, along with Scripture, that the Rock is Christ, so Peter's participation in the Rock is his Confession that Christ is the Son of the Living God: On this Rock (Peter's Confession) Christ will built His Church.

We are all to be obedient to the occupant of the Petrine Office in so far as what he is doing and saying is in harmony with the Confession of Peter and previous popes within that same harmony. The Papacy is bigger than any one man.