Though the compromises of the SSPX began almost immediately upon the death of +Lefebvre, the reversal of his policy vis-a-vis modernist Rome was not made public until February, 2012.
HONOURING APOSTATES – St. Marcel Initiative
The Newsociety does not compromise? To venerate apostates is not wise! If these “Comments” sometimes shock good souls by how they can present either the …
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
FAITH HOPE CHARITY
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
SSPX and The Remnant - Now Under Strong Zionist Influence
Posted on 25.08.2016 | Updated on 05.09.2016 |
SSPX and The Remnant - Now Under Strong Zionist Influence
THAT THE SSPX AND THE REMNANT ARE NOW UNDER STRONG ZIONIST INFLUENCE CAN NO LONGER BE DENIED – Posted 12/12/12 by Hugh Akins.
One-time anti-Zionist Society of St. Pius X (when it was in the far more competent hands of Abp. Lefebvre, Bp …More
SSPX and The Remnant - Now Under Strong Zionist Influence
Posted on 25.08.2016 | Updated on 05.09.2016 |
SSPX and The Remnant - Now Under Strong Zionist Influence
THAT THE SSPX AND THE REMNANT ARE NOW UNDER STRONG ZIONIST INFLUENCE CAN NO LONGER BE DENIED – Posted 12/12/12 by Hugh Akins.
One-time anti-Zionist Society of St. Pius X (when it was in the far more competent hands of Abp. Lefebvre, Bp. Williamson, Fr. Peter Scott, Fr. Novak, etc.) IS NOW UNDER STRONG ZIONIST INFLUENCE.
I have personally never accused SSPX attorney and top financial officer Maximilian Krah of being a Zionist sympathizer, apologist or agent – UNTIL HE HIMSELF ADMITTED AS MUCH IN THE INTERVIEW RECENTLY PUBLISHED IN THE PAGES OF THE REMNANT.
Now, there is no question but that Mr. Krah, by his own admission, is CERTAINLY AN ISRAELI/ZIONIST APOLOGIST. And let’s be truthful about it: (1) By retaining Krah’s professional services, Bp. Fellay, the SSPX Superior General, has allowed the Society to come under strong Zionist influence; and (2) by publishing this interview in The Remnant, Michael Matt and Christopher Ferrara have also demonstrated, for all to see, where their own loyalties reside: with the mass- murderers of Tel Aviv, the very terrorist regime that has been long engaged in the rape of the Holy Land, the mass-exodus from there of countless Catholics and Christians, and the brutal genocide of Palestinians.
The Krah interview, intended to silence criticism of Mr. Krah, obviously backfired in their faces. No longer can Mr. Krah, Bp. Fellay, Michael Matt or Christopher Ferrara deny that they have all, each and every one, lent themselves to serving the cause of the Synagogue of Satan in its war against the Mystical Body of Christ. This is the dire consequence of their thinking and actions, even if unintended.
May God have mercy on their souls.
Hugh Akins
Posted on 25.08.2016 | Updated on 05.09.2016 |
SSPX and The Remnant - Now Under Strong Zionist Influence
THAT THE SSPX AND THE REMNANT ARE NOW UNDER STRONG ZIONIST INFLUENCE CAN NO LONGER BE DENIED – Posted 12/12/12 by Hugh Akins.
One-time anti-Zionist Society of St. Pius X (when it was in the far more competent hands of Abp. Lefebvre, Bp. Williamson, Fr. Peter Scott, Fr. Novak, etc.) IS NOW UNDER STRONG ZIONIST INFLUENCE.
I have personally never accused SSPX attorney and top financial officer Maximilian Krah of being a Zionist sympathizer, apologist or agent – UNTIL HE HIMSELF ADMITTED AS MUCH IN THE INTERVIEW RECENTLY PUBLISHED IN THE PAGES OF THE REMNANT.
Now, there is no question but that Mr. Krah, by his own admission, is CERTAINLY AN ISRAELI/ZIONIST APOLOGIST. And let’s be truthful about it: (1) By retaining Krah’s professional services, Bp. Fellay, the SSPX Superior General, has allowed the Society to come under strong Zionist influence; and (2) by publishing this interview in The Remnant, Michael Matt and Christopher Ferrara have also demonstrated, for all to see, where their own loyalties reside: with the mass- murderers of Tel Aviv, the very terrorist regime that has been long engaged in the rape of the Holy Land, the mass-exodus from there of countless Catholics and Christians, and the brutal genocide of Palestinians.
The Krah interview, intended to silence criticism of Mr. Krah, obviously backfired in their faces. No longer can Mr. Krah, Bp. Fellay, Michael Matt or Christopher Ferrara deny that they have all, each and every one, lent themselves to serving the cause of the Synagogue of Satan in its war against the Mystical Body of Christ. This is the dire consequence of their thinking and actions, even if unintended.
May God have mercy on their souls.
Hugh Akins
Phil48.com
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
It seems, now 24 years since the "secret negotiations" that no compromise was ever reached. The SSPX has not compromised their principles, has not changed one iota of their founding principles and has remained "distinct" from the Conciliar Church, just as the Archbishop intended.
I know several priests who knew Bishop Williamson when he was part of the SSPX and speak of him highly. Alas, Bishop …More
It seems, now 24 years since the "secret negotiations" that no compromise was ever reached. The SSPX has not compromised their principles, has not changed one iota of their founding principles and has remained "distinct" from the Conciliar Church, just as the Archbishop intended.
I know several priests who knew Bishop Williamson when he was part of the SSPX and speak of him highly. Alas, Bishop Williamson, like many who did not trust the SSPX leadership to stay true to the Archbishop's principles, raises those old implications which never came to fruition as a justification for his own choice.
I know several priests who knew Bishop Williamson when he was part of the SSPX and speak of him highly. Alas, Bishop Williamson, like many who did not trust the SSPX leadership to stay true to the Archbishop's principles, raises those old implications which never came to fruition as a justification for his own choice.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
A perfect display of ignorance in the face of direct evidence to the contrary (ie., ill-disposed to the reception of truth).
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Phil48.com
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Hi there. I am not sure of which compromises you speak (and am not prepared to pay $30 to find out). I have only been attending an SSPX since Covid. My experience is that Rome is respected on items not contrary to the pre-Vatican II faith (e.g. the year of St. Joseph). I attended the adult Ed. Course offered which went through the Baltimore Catechism for adults and nothing was cut or twisted. It …More
Hi there. I am not sure of which compromises you speak (and am not prepared to pay $30 to find out). I have only been attending an SSPX since Covid. My experience is that Rome is respected on items not contrary to the pre-Vatican II faith (e.g. the year of St. Joseph). I attended the adult Ed. Course offered which went through the Baltimore Catechism for adults and nothing was cut or twisted. It does seem that these priests are indeed following the Archbishop’s lead. He knew the new mass was harmful and heretical, but did not claim the see was vacant. He showed deference to Rome wherever he could. His actions may be considered compromises, e.g. including the Pope in the Te igitur, but, through the grace of God, was able to establish and maintain the Society legally within the Church of Rome but also separate from the Counciliar Church.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
*Lefebvre:
“It is a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.”
Spiritual Journey, 1991.
He dies 6 weeks later.
By 1992, Fr. Aulagnier (former French District Superior and 1st Assistant to the Superior General, expelled in 2003 for openly supporting …More
*Lefebvre:
“It is a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.”
Spiritual Journey, 1991.
He dies 6 weeks later.
By 1992, Fr. Aulagnier (former French District Superior and 1st Assistant to the Superior General, expelled in 2003 for openly supporting the Campos accord with Rome) is reaching out to conciliar authorities.
By 1997, the SSPX is involved in “discreet but not secret” negotiations brokered by the French conciliar GREC (Groupe for Reflection Between Catholics) for a practical accord with modernist Rome, in direct violation of +Lefebvre’s principle.
The secret negotiations culminate in the 2000 Pilgrimage of Tradition to Rome (ostensibly organized to display the vigor of Tradition to Rome, but in fact symbolizing the SSPX’s readiness to enter the pluralist conciliar church.
From this point on, Cardinal Hoyos would approve, in principle, to working out an accord with the SSPX (who in turn would agree to soften their positions In furtherance of that objective.
My book “As We Are?” documents over 100 changes, compromises, and contradictions of the SSPX as it began stealthily reorganizing its positions and apostolate to prepare the minds of its clergy and faithful to accept this new orientation (a preparation explicitly acknowledged by +de Galarreta in his November/2011 “Reflections on a Roman Proposal” at the meeting of major superiors in Albany, Italy (a meeting at which +Williamson was deliberately excluded, +Fellay knowing he would oppose the betrayal of +Lefebvre).
“It is a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.”
Spiritual Journey, 1991.
He dies 6 weeks later.
By 1992, Fr. Aulagnier (former French District Superior and 1st Assistant to the Superior General, expelled in 2003 for openly supporting the Campos accord with Rome) is reaching out to conciliar authorities.
By 1997, the SSPX is involved in “discreet but not secret” negotiations brokered by the French conciliar GREC (Groupe for Reflection Between Catholics) for a practical accord with modernist Rome, in direct violation of +Lefebvre’s principle.
The secret negotiations culminate in the 2000 Pilgrimage of Tradition to Rome (ostensibly organized to display the vigor of Tradition to Rome, but in fact symbolizing the SSPX’s readiness to enter the pluralist conciliar church.
From this point on, Cardinal Hoyos would approve, in principle, to working out an accord with the SSPX (who in turn would agree to soften their positions In furtherance of that objective.
My book “As We Are?” documents over 100 changes, compromises, and contradictions of the SSPX as it began stealthily reorganizing its positions and apostolate to prepare the minds of its clergy and faithful to accept this new orientation (a preparation explicitly acknowledged by +de Galarreta in his November/2011 “Reflections on a Roman Proposal” at the meeting of major superiors in Albany, Italy (a meeting at which +Williamson was deliberately excluded, +Fellay knowing he would oppose the betrayal of +Lefebvre).
Martin Serling Sloan
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The Sede's and the Resistance have one thing in common. They both hate the SSPX. They are also some of the most arrogant people I have ever met. Is the SSPX perfect by no means! Are they immune from bad leadership, no. Can the gates of hell prevail against them, Absolutely. But these prognosticators of doom and sell out want nothing more than to say I told you so at the ruin of the SSPX.
Sean Johnson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
No. We resent that we tried to save it, and were scorned for doing so.
FAITH HOPE CHARITY
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Martin, ''prognosticators of doom'' are too similar to the words of Pope John xxiii when he refused to obey the message he received by Sr. Lucy from the BLESSED VIRGIN MARY that heaven commanded that he, the Pope, along with ALL the bishops in the world MUST Consecrate Russia to the IMMACULATE HEART of MARY.
In place of obeying heaven, Pope John commenced vatican 2, and his disobedience has resulted …More
Martin, ''prognosticators of doom'' are too similar to the words of Pope John xxiii when he refused to obey the message he received by Sr. Lucy from the BLESSED VIRGIN MARY that heaven commanded that he, the Pope, along with ALL the bishops in the world MUST Consecrate Russia to the IMMACULATE HEART of MARY.
In place of obeying heaven, Pope John commenced vatican 2, and his disobedience has resulted in the great apostasy of our times, the ANTIPOPE bergoglio along with the bergoglian accomplices usurping and occupying the present Vatican, and their inversion of the TRUTH and DOCTRINES regarding GOD'S TRUE CHURCH along with the inversion of GOD'S Moral Code implemented and practiced by these ''cesspools of impurity''.
The SSPX has fallen from what is was when Archbishop Lefebvre founded it. This can be discerned by reading to seek out the truth. The SSPX is not the same, and this is sorrowful, but true; and at least you should want to understand that the SSPX is in a hidden state of union, especially since 2012, with the Rome which the Blessed Virgin foretold would be the ''seat of the anti-christ''. This has been fulfilled in our times with ANTIPOPE bergoglio who is not only an invalid usurper, but also the enemy of JESUS CHRIST.
The SSPX should have been opposed to the plandemic death inoculations and yet, it supported them knowing that the jabs contained abortion materials, and now the SSPX knows the death jabs are a world-wide mass murdering genocidal campaign; and what is the SSPX doing about this today and their culpability for this undeniable ''mistake'' that is continuing worldwide.
Some 9 years of attending the SSPX previously have provided the first hand experience; and researching Archbishop Lefebvre and a great deal more has revealed that their hierarchy are keeping a good deal hidden from their followers.
In place of obeying heaven, Pope John commenced vatican 2, and his disobedience has resulted in the great apostasy of our times, the ANTIPOPE bergoglio along with the bergoglian accomplices usurping and occupying the present Vatican, and their inversion of the TRUTH and DOCTRINES regarding GOD'S TRUE CHURCH along with the inversion of GOD'S Moral Code implemented and practiced by these ''cesspools of impurity''.
The SSPX has fallen from what is was when Archbishop Lefebvre founded it. This can be discerned by reading to seek out the truth. The SSPX is not the same, and this is sorrowful, but true; and at least you should want to understand that the SSPX is in a hidden state of union, especially since 2012, with the Rome which the Blessed Virgin foretold would be the ''seat of the anti-christ''. This has been fulfilled in our times with ANTIPOPE bergoglio who is not only an invalid usurper, but also the enemy of JESUS CHRIST.
The SSPX should have been opposed to the plandemic death inoculations and yet, it supported them knowing that the jabs contained abortion materials, and now the SSPX knows the death jabs are a world-wide mass murdering genocidal campaign; and what is the SSPX doing about this today and their culpability for this undeniable ''mistake'' that is continuing worldwide.
Some 9 years of attending the SSPX previously have provided the first hand experience; and researching Archbishop Lefebvre and a great deal more has revealed that their hierarchy are keeping a good deal hidden from their followers.