An Open Letter to all Clergy Across the Board In Order to stop and put an end to the Clergy Sexual Abuse I will do the following: If found guilty I will have you sign a legal contract giving you the …More
An Open Letter to all Clergy Across the Board In Order to stop and put an end to the Clergy Sexual Abuse I will do the following: If found guilty I will have you sign a legal contract giving you the selection of: A) Immediate defrocking and being fed to the wolves or B) Remain as a low ranking priest, with me personally cutting off your balls. ( castration) Take your pick. It’s about time for you bastards to learn: NO MEANS NO
The former nuncio to Washington D.C., Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò, has accused Pope Francis of being a homosexual. Referring to former Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, 93, who was accused of …More
The former nuncio to Washington D.C., Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò, has accused Pope Francis of being a homosexual. Referring to former Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, 93, who was accused of homosexual misconduct, Viganò writes on Twitter.com (29 May): "Bergoglio himself committed the same abuses when he was Master of Novices of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, as personally confided to me by one of his former novices". If Viganò is not allowed to publish the name of his witness, he would at least be obliged to present the accusations in detail, otherwise, they are worthless. #newsSoaokvduiz
Today is the "memorial of "saint" Paul Vi on the Novus Ordo calendar. Our priest waxed eloquently on him at Mass today It got me thinking, compared to Francis - who has caused more damage to the …More
Today is the "memorial of "saint" Paul Vi on the Novus Ordo calendar. Our priest waxed eloquently on him at Mass today It got me thinking, compared to Francis - who has caused more damage to the Church?
Paul VI approved the documents of the Second Vatican Council. He also stated that from now on everyone must be transformed into the “image of the …More
Paul VI approved the documents of the Second Vatican Council. He also stated that from now on everyone must be transformed into the “image of the Conciliar Church.”
On 23 June 2013 when I met Bergoglio at the Domus Sanctæ Marthæ - as already extensively reported in my Memorial of August 22, 2018 - he asked me ex abrupto: «What is Cardinal McCarrick like?» I replied …More
On 23 June 2013 when I met Bergoglio at the Domus Sanctæ Marthæ - as already extensively reported in my Memorial of August 22, 2018 - he asked me ex abrupto: «What is Cardinal McCarrick like?» I replied to him: « Holy Father, I don’t know if you know Cardinal McCarrick, but if you ask the Congregation for Bishops, there is a dossier this big. He corrupted generations of seminarians...» Bergoglio remained impassive and completely changed the subject. His reaction is not surprising: Bergoglio himself committed the same abuses when he was Master of Novices of the Society of Jesus in Argentina, as personally confided to me by one of his former novices. 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗼𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗼 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀: 𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘅𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮, 𝘀𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗺𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀. …More
It is of vital importance, due to the great perplexity it causes in many souls, especially when they have begun to attend the traditional Mass, to know if they are conscientiously obliged to attend the …More
It is of vital importance, due to the great perplexity it causes in many souls, especially when they have begun to attend the traditional Mass, to know if they are conscientiously obliged to attend the Mass of Paul VI, when they cannot have the traditional Mass. Is this Mass not valid, they ask? And if it is valid, why should it be considered illegal, and not attend it? To answer these and other similar questions, it is advisable to proceed with due distinctions and explanations. Google-translation of the page of fsspx.es 1st Conditions for the validity of the Mass Let's start with the validity of the New Mass . The new Mass, is it valid? In matters of Sacraments, such as the Holy Mass –Sacrament of the Eucharist–, three requirements are necessary for validity: • matter: in this case, wheat bread and grape wine; •form: here the words of the consecration; • and intention to consecrate, that is, to do what the Church does. These three requirements are sufficient for the sacramental sign …More
Judge Merchan is gave the standard instruction that the jury can reach inferences based on facts such as inferring that it rained from seeing people in …More
Judge Merchan is gave the standard instruction that the jury can reach inferences based on facts such as inferring that it rained from seeing people in raincoats. Based on this logic, we can infer James Martin SJ is a fag.
Oh my goodness!!! That is awesome! It is on my list to make a pilgrimage across the pond to see his gravesite and see his house in Beaconsfield. I know …More
Oh my goodness!!! That is awesome! It is on my list to make a pilgrimage across the pond to see his gravesite and see his house in Beaconsfield. I know a few years back they were talking about tearing it down? That would be a great injustice!!! Thank you for that link.
FRANCIS LOVES MARXISTS BECAUSE…. We know as Catholics that is impossible to be a member of the true Body of Christ and at the same time espouse an ideology which has contrary principles to Christianity …More
FRANCIS LOVES MARXISTS BECAUSE…. We know as Catholics that is impossible to be a member of the true Body of Christ and at the same time espouse an ideology which has contrary principles to Christianity. You cannot be a Catholic and a Freemason, Socialist or a Marxist and be Catholic its pure and simple. The infallible ordinary Magersterium has declared it as such. Yet Francis has been on record saying Marxists make the best Christians. click below to read on (become a member to tradcatknight today) FRANCIS LOVES MARXISTS BECAUSE….
@123jussi I had deleted my account, but re-created it to find out what you're talking about. Doing some googling, I can't find anything related to any …More
@123jussi I had deleted my account, but re-created it to find out what you're talking about. Doing some googling, I can't find anything related to any kind of admonition against this devotion. It's a devotion from the 14 century. Pope Urban VI recommended it in the same century. It received papal approval in the 16th. It received papal approval again in 1863. It was given an imprimatur in 1903, and apparently again in 1940. Can you please provide a source for your claim about a papal admonition? I do see a brief note that from one published source that says "Are published under sanction of the Decree of November 18, 1966, published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, Vol. 58, No. 16 of December 29, 1966." But I can't read the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, because it appears to be only published in one language, so I have no idea what the sanction is. Whatever it is, it doesn't appear to limit the publication or application of this devotion. I also see a Fisheaters article which is critical of the …More
X link to Mark Levin post I am not in the Manhattan courthouse, but I am listening carefully to what lawyers I trust (from Fox) who are there are texting/emailing to reporters, who are, in turn, reading …More
X link to Mark Levin post I am not in the Manhattan courthouse, but I am listening carefully to what lawyers I trust (from Fox) who are there are texting/emailing to reporters, who are, in turn, reading them on air at Fox, as well as those who have left the courthouse and are speaking directly on air. The judge is a disgusting fraud who has his foot on the defense lawyer's neck, while he allows the prosecutor to ramble on in every direction, including (only now) about federal campaign law and personal insinuations about Trump, as well as suggestions that Cohen's actions can be inferred on to Trump. Outrageous. This judge was specifically appointed to handle this case. From the start, he has shredded the law and the rules of evidence, he has stomped all over due process, he has silenced Trump respecting most aspects of the case, he has allowed collateral evidence into the trial (of which there is a ton), he has assumed jurisdiction over federal election law (preventing the defense from …More
la verdad prevalece
It got me thinking, compared to Francis - who has caused more damage to the …More
